Just how low has the quality of health journalism now sunk citing a journalistic need to go “undercover” as the only way then having a prepared attack on breastfeeding advocacy . All groups using volunteers will from time to time have an issue with one exceeding their scope or going to far when this happens responsible individuals feed this back to the groups involved so that it can be sorted out.  they do not go out seeking a story to sensationalize  extremely important public health issues. How did we get to this stage where journalists see health as a area where accuracy and balance is not important why do we see responsible intelligent journalism from the media on politics and business then sensationalist scaremongering combined with a belief that it is acceptable to promote health practices that have no evidence at all  behind them as fact! . Has the health portfolio now been given to entertainment journalists ?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-31/nyc-mayor-bloomberg-seeks-ban-on-super-size-soft-drinks.html

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/the-ill-effects-of-quackery-v-scientific-evidence/story-e6frg8y6-1226308577109

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/peddling-chemists-overstep-the-mark/story-e6frerdf-1226286547412

Looks like legislation will need to look a little deeper to help reduce the bombardment. still at least other countries are trying perhaps Australia industry will magically self regulate

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/241765.php

http://health.usnews.com/health-news/news/articles/2012/02/21/type-1-diabetes-may-develop-more-slowly-than-thought

https://theconversation.edu.au/pointing-the-bone-at-chiropractic-quackery-lessons-from-the-uk-5021